While we had hoped that the author would come and speak at our meeting, at the last minute, she had to cancel.  But being a determined group, we pressed on.  Besides, Joan brought cookies.

We agreed that the author did an excellent job of presenting the case and we found the various threads of her family’s history, the historical and cultural implications of the crime, and the investigative process nicely woven together.  Of those threads, the author’s personal story of her search for the truth was most compelling.  It gave the reader an emotional connection to the story that we don’t usually see.

The story didn’t drag and we all hoped for Dyer’s reprieve right up until the end.  We found the beginning of the particularly engrossing, while the courtroom chapters were dryer and less gripping.  Joan also brought maps showing the route the little girls would have had to walk both in modern-day terms, and in terms of what the area looked like in the 1930s.  This bit of evidence, more than anything else, convinced us of Dyer’s innocence.

The subject, of course, is horrifying, but on the flip side, we found  so many things about the era and the way people reacted to the crime fascinating — Newspaper coverage from coast to coast; people going to the courthouse, night after night, demanding justice; people sitting down and writing letters with the thought and time that went into their protests and queries.  And we found it very interesting that these letters and newspaper accounts still survive to allow the author to re-live that time and to shine light on an important historical case.

Favorite Character – The author, whose personality and presence is felt throughout the book.  Loyal and stalwart Haskell Wright.  The father of the Everett girls.

Least Favorite Character – The judge.  Albert Dyer – Joan wanted to slap him and tell him to just shut up.  We also didn’t like Dyer’s wife.